To the Editor,
Re: Marijuana ‘reeferendum’ misguided, BC Views, Oct. 10.
Mr. Fletcher’s recent column misrepresented the Sensible BC campaign, and could lead to confusion about our efforts for a marijuana referendum.
The ultimate aim of Sensible BC is to have BC’s marijuana industry regulated in a similar manner to wine. Our proposed legislation, the Sensible Policing Act, is designed to bring us closer to that goal.
The Sensible Policing Act has four components, all carefully designed to be within provincial jurisdiction.
The first aspect is to redirect police resources away from being wasted on simple possession of marijuana.
If Sensible BC is successful, then tens of thousands of hours of police and court time would immediately be freed up to pursue real criminals. This means safer communities for everyone, and less backlog in our courts.
Second, our legislation treats a minor in possession of marijuana exactly the same as if it were alcohol.
Third, the Sensible Policing Act calls upon the federal government to repeal marijuana prohibition, so that BC can regulate and tax it in a manner similar to wine and beer.
This would send a powerful message of change to Ottawa, and give our prime minister the mandate to legalize.
Finally, our legislation would create a BC commission to figure out the rules needed to implement legalization. Like alcohol and tobacco, most of the regulation for legal marijuana would be determined at the provincial level.
British Columbia cannot fully legalize marijuana without a change to federal law, but we can take some sensible steps in the right direction. That is what Sensible BC is all about.
Dana Larsen,
Sensible BC