Skip to content

UPDATED: Somass River closed to sockeye fishery

Early closure aimed at conserving Great Central Lake stock
12696387_web1_Somassrecfishery2-18july18
Recreational anglers fish on the Somass River in early June. MIKE YOUDS PHOTO

BY MIKE YOUDS

Special to the News

Tthe Somass River is officially closed to sockeye fishing after a second disappointing season in a row.

Tsu-ma-uss (Tseshaht and Hupacasath) fishermen voluntarily pulled their nets in the first week of July, responding to concerns about low sockeye escapement to Great Central Lake. The decision to keep the fishery closed was made at a harvest roundtable on July 12.

“I’ve never seen it in my lifetime,” said Steven Tatoosh, natural resource manager with the Hupacasath First Nation.

About half of the projected sockeye escapement has been counted, roughly 120,000 fish, well short of the 350,000 forecast, said Ryan O’Connell, resource manager with Fisheries and Oceans Canada.

“The First Nations fishing has closed down other than a bit of dip netting in Sproat River,” O’Connell said last week, before the complete closure was announced. O’Connell is responsible for management area 23, Alberni Inlet-Barkley Sound.

There remains a possibility that more sockeye may enter the river, in which case the roundtable, comprised of fishery stakeholders, could choose to reopen the river fisheries.

In the meantime, a marine hook-and-line recreational fishery remains open south of Polly Point. The roundtable reasons that the recreational fishery — with a projected catch of 500 fish including 100 from Great Central — has a much lesser impact on overall escapement.

“This is the roundtable trying to balance economic and environmental concerns,” O’Connell said.

This season was expected to be an improvement over 2017 returns. The fishery was prematurely closed then reopened last summer amid escapement concerns resulting from extremely high temperatures in the river. That’s not an issue this year. Instead, stock assessment has been tricky.

“It’s been a weird year,” said Andrew Olson, fisheries manager and biologist with Tseshaht First Nation. “The run timing seems to be a bit different.”

At this point, they’re being more cautious than optimistic in predicting the remaining return to Great Central Lake.

“There was a lot of planning done by stock assessment biologists and fisheries managers,” Olson said following the roundtable. “The plan was always to fish earlier to harvest more from the plentiful Sproat run which has returned and escaped at a good high level.

“The plan was always to protect the Great Central run with early closure. We fished on a runsize forecast and harvest rate for a smaller than expected run,” he explained. “All fisheries stayed within a few percentage points of their harvest rate.

“This area is lucky to have a roundtable that collaborates to harvest fish in a sustainable way. The escapement targets we follow are generally based on producing large returns rather than just keeping the run going.

“It’s definitely a disappointment for the membership, no doubt about it,” Olson said of the communal river fishery. “It’s not what they were hoping for.”

They had hoped for a rebound season, especially after returning two-year-old jacks were plentiful, indicating a larger return would be arriving after four years. That never materialized, though.

O’Connell said DFO doesn’t know what is affecting the productivity of Great Central Lake although water temperature may be the culprit.

“Temperatures are definitely a theory. The fish in Great Central Lake have a longer river to travel.”

At this point, however, he doesn’t think it’s an ongoing issue. Much higher sockeye escapements are forecast over the next couple of seasons.

There has been no First Nations commercial fishery in the river this season since no commercial agreement was in place. For the past half-dozen years, such agreements have allowed for the sale of sockeye catches to fish processors. Negotiating for better terms, the community voted against signing the proposed agreement earlier in the year.

“It probably has absolutely affected the bottom line for Tseshaht fishermen,” Olson said.

About one-third of Tseshaht catch is sold by street vendors while two-thirds goes to processors if a commercial agreement is in place. Fishermen hope that they can compensate for the poor catch through a chinook fishery later in the summer, Olson said.