Skip to content

EI reform bad labour strategy

For labor strategy EI reform is a bad idea, one reader says.

To the Editor,

The Conservative government claims that it is making fundamental changes to Employment Insurance to deal with “unprecedented” shortages in skilled labour, especially in the West.

However, these reforms do nothing to help the 154,000 unemployed British Columbians develop the skills and get the training they need to fill those shortages.

Instead, the government’s strategy appears to be to force seasonal workers from rural Canada to move, separating them from their families and emptying their communities.

The changes will also force the unemployed to accept work at up to a 30 per cent pay cut, or else they will lose their EI benefits. Under this system, employers will be stuck with employees who don’t want to be there and plan to leave as soon as they can. Hardly a recipe for positive workplace morale or productivity.

All of which is not to say that the current system is perfect—it does need improvements. In fact, some of the current changes are positive, like extending the “working while on claim” pilot and making the “best 14 weeks” program permanent.

Both of those pilot projects were created by Liberals over a half-decade ago, to test new, innovative reforms to the EI system.

Unfortunately, the current government has created policy on the fly, with no consultation, based on a belief that EI claimants – especially seasonal workers in Atlantic Canada – are lazy and need to be forced to work.

The government should be narrowing the rural-urban divide, not expanding it.

Rodger Cuzner,

MP and

Liberal critic for Human Resources and Skills Development